Proposal Summary
- $0.75 per-parcel surcharge on e-commerce shipments to Alberta
- Estimated annual revenue: approximately $142 million
- Structured as regulatory fee, not general tax
- Dedicated funding for road and bridge infrastructure
The Non-Partisan Association proposes a novel, legally defensible mechanism to generate new provincial revenue without imposing a general tax. This proposal leverages existing provincial jurisdiction over infrastructure and waste management to create a regulatory user fee on e-commerce parcels: the Alberta Road & Bridge Recovery Fee (ARBRF).
The Mechanism
The ARBRF is a mandatory $0.75 per-parcel surcharge collected at the point of sale by e-commerce facilitators (e.g., Amazon, Walmart) for all shipments destined for an Alberta address.
| Component | Details |
|---|---|
| Fee Amount | $0.75 per parcel—a modest, widely acceptable amount |
| Estimated Annual Revenue | Approximately $141.6 million (based on 188.8 million parcels/year) |
| Collection Method | Collected at point of sale by e-commerce facilitators |
| Applicability | All shipments destined for Alberta addresses |
Constitutional and Legal Framework
The legality of the ARBRF rests on two key principles of Canadian constitutional law:
Provincial Jurisdiction
The province has the exclusive right to legislate regarding "Local Works and Undertakings" and "Property and Civil Rights in the Province" under the Constitution Act, 1867.
The "Regulatory Charge" Test
A fee is legal if it meets these criteria:
- It is connected to a specific regulatory scheme (Road Maintenance)
- The revenue is used exclusively for that scheme, not general funds
- The fee is roughly proportional to the cost of the service provided
The ARBRF meets these criteria by funding a dedicated, ring-fenced infrastructure program. It is not a general sales tax, which avoids conflict with federal tax law by adhering strictly to the legal definition of a "regulatory charge" tied to specific services.
Revenue Allocation
Public acceptance could be improved by connecting the fee directly to visible infrastructure improvements. The NPA proposes the following dedicated allocation:
| Allocation | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 70% to Municipalities | Local Road Grants addressing residential road wear and tear from delivery vehicles |
| 30% to Provincial Fund | Rural Bridge & Culvert Repair addressing rural infrastructure needs |
Implementation Considerations
- Legislative Framework: Legislation requiring e-commerce entities to collect and remit the per-parcel fee
- Transparency: Clear labeling of the fee on customer receipts to show exactly where the money goes
- Dedicated Use: Ensuring revenue is used specifically for infrastructure programs, with public reporting on projects funded
- Compliance Mechanisms: Reasonable enforcement provisions for e-commerce facilitators
Rationale
The explosive growth of e-commerce has fundamentally changed how goods move through Alberta communities. Delivery vehicles now make multiple daily trips through residential neighborhoods, accelerating wear on local roads that were not designed for commercial traffic volumes.
This fee creates a direct connection between the activity causing infrastructure wear (parcel delivery) and funding for repair—a principle that aligns with the "user pays" approach common in infrastructure finance.
Conclusion
Implementing a per-parcel fee on e-commerce shipments could generate significant annual revenue to address the impacts of increased delivery traffic on infrastructure. This approach warrants further consideration as a sustainable, legally sound mechanism for infrastructure investment.